<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>J-H Post &#187; politicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.j-hady.com/tag/politicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.j-hady.com</link>
	<description>We deliver news in the easiest way of our choice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama calls charges against Rangel &#8216;troubling&#8217; (AP)</title>
		<link>http://www.j-hady.com/obama-calls-charges-against-rangel-troubling-ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.j-hady.com/obama-calls-charges-against-rangel-troubling-ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[towns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veteran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.j-hady.com/obama-calls-charges-against-rangel-troubling-ap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ WASHINGTON &#8211; President Barack Obama on Friday called ethics charges against Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel "very troubling" and said he hopes the longtime lawmaker can end his career with dignity. Several House Democrats went further, flat-out urging the New York congressman to resign. "He's somebody who's at the end of his career," Obama said in an interview that aired Friday on "CBS Evening News with Katie Couric." "I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity. And my hope is that it happens." Obama, speaking on the issue for the first time, praised the 20-term Rangel for serving his constituents well but called the more than one-dozen tax and disclosure charges against him "very troubling." It was hardly an endorsement for the veteran lawmaker, but fell well short of the calls for resignation Rangel received on the eve of the House's August recess. As House Democrats headed home, they wrestled with how to handle the matter in their districts ahead of the midterm elections. Republicans, meanwhile, raced ahead with plans to make Rangel the face of corrupt Washington under the rule of Democrats who had vowed to clean up Congress. For his part, Rangel met with perhaps his staunchest supporters, members of the New York state delegation, in the stately Capitol parlor named for the Ways and Means Committee that he headed until March. "He indicated there was some sloppiness" in his official papers, Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., told reporters, "but, you know, there's no criminality here." House rules and credibility &#8212; not criminality &#8212; were the reasons cited by more than a half dozen House Democrats known to have called for Rangel's resignation by late afternoon Friday. A House panel on Thursday made public for the first time 13 charges of misusing his office and tax and disclosure violations against Rangel, 80, as it opened the trial phase of the ethics proceedings against him. If Rangel and the ethics committee do not settle the case, it goes to a public trial this fall, at the height of an election season in which every member of the House, 36 in the Senate and the Democratic majorities of both chambers are on the line. Either conditionally or outright, Democrats calling for Rangel's resignation included Rep. Walter Minnick of Idaho, Betty Sutton of Ohio, John Yarmuth of Kentucky, Zack Space of Ohio, Ann Kirkpatrick of Arizona and Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio. "Too many politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, have fallen victim to the idea that they are 'different' than regular folks and nothing could be further from the truth," Kirkpatrick said in a statement. "It is our job as members of Congress to hold each other accountable to a higher standard regardless of party," she added. "If the serious charges against (Rangel) are accurate, he needs to resign." Rangel denies the charges and says the indictment released Thursday contains factual errors. "We've heard Charlie in the Ways and Means Committee, and he's addressed these charges. He never denied they happened. He always has an explanation. You can excuse one or two, but not 13," Yarmuth told the Louisville Courier-Journal in an interview published Friday. "I don't see how he can stay if they're true. I believe they are." Back home in Rangel's Harlem district, he remains revered and could well win reelection if his political career survives the ethics probe. One constituent said Friday she had mixed feelings after reading news accounts of the allegations against him. "I don't think he is 100 percent honest, but he's no worse than other politicians," said Charynda Morez, a college student, who was buying groceries at a deli. She said that she didn't know how he should be punished, but that Rangel should resign anyway. Rangel has four apartments "when there are people who don't have a home," she said, citing allegations that Rangel lived in four combined rent-stabilized apartments instead of one, in violation of New York City law. Democratic leaders are urging their members to cast the election as one about a choice between their party, which under President Barack Obama has overhauled health care and Wall Street, and a GOP-tea party combination that wants to roll back Democratic accomplishments. House Republicans relished using Rangel to change the subject &#8212; especially if he does not reach a settlement with the ethics committee. A public trial equates to a free media presentation of the misdeeds of one of the most senior Democrats in the House. The House Republicans' campaign arm released a list of Democrats who have not returned campaign contributions they received from Rangel during their careers and said those lawmakers would face questions about the matter from constituents during the August break. "It's very difficult for Democrats to make the case that this is a 'choice' election when the national headlines are focused around an ethics scandal that has clearly impacted the party in power," said Ken Spain, spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee. Rangel retained many supporters Friday. The New York delegation and the Congressional Black Caucus, which was co-founded by Rangel, urged their colleagues not to rush to judgment. House leaders eager to avoid alienating black voters remained mum on what Rangel should do. Some Democrats privately said they took a small measure of comfort in one revelation. Rep. Gene Green, the Texas Democrat who led the four-member bipartisan panel of investigators, told reporters that his committee recommended a relatively mild punishment for Rangel &#8212; reprimand, a statement of wrongdoing voted by the whole House that carries no other penalty. But statements continued to trickle out that left no doubt that at some point, Democrats would have to look out for No. 1 - themselves. "If at the trial's conclusion Mr. Rangel is found guilty by his peers, then he should incur the full punishment allowed by the House, including removal from office," said Rep. Bobby Bright, D-Ala. ___ Associated Press writers Larry Margasak and Ben Evans contributed to this report. Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter , become a fan on Facebook ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.j-hady.com/obama-calls-charges-against-rangel-troubling-ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bottle of pills to kick the bottle</title>
		<link>http://www.j-hady.com/a-bottle-of-pills-to-kick-the-bottle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.j-hady.com/a-bottle-of-pills-to-kick-the-bottle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niaaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomson-pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united-states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world-health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.j-hady.com/a-bottle-of-pills-to-kick-the-bottle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ < 1 / 2 > View Full Size LONDON (Reuters) - Does this sound like anyone you know? Darryl is 35, has a steady job, a stable home and good marriage, enjoys a few beers in front of the TV most nights -- doesn't have what most people would call a drink problem. Health   &#124;   Lifestyle In the United States alone there are probably around 36 million Darryls, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), which created the character, played by an actor on its website to help train doctors. He doesn't exercise as much as maybe he should so he's a little overweight. At an average of four drinks a day, he is no alcoholic: but some experts now see him as a high-risk drinker and say he could succumb to "alcohol use disorder." Millions more people across the developed world -- who drink a few glasses of wine every night after work or look forward to three nights of repeated shots with chasers on the weekends -- may today be adding up to a major health and social problem. Could there be a pill to help them? A reassessment of the nature of addiction, particularly to alcohol, is starting to pique Big Pharma's interest. For years the industry has been lukewarm, assuming either that finding a cure for alcoholism is impossible, or else that the target market -- homeless drop-outs, jobless bums and convicted drink drivers -- would not make for great returns. Now changing western attitudes and cheap supermarket-supplied alcohol have made excessive drinking normal, including among the middle classes. Some experts predict the arrival soon of a new generation of drugs to help everyday drinkers. "The potential market for medications that can be prescribed for these functional alcoholics is huge," said Mark Willenbring, an addiction expert and psychiatrist in the United States. Just as with depression treatment 30 years ago, he says alcoholism research could be approaching a "Prozac moment" when it will become more natural, and more acceptable, for doctors to prescribe a pill to help people through a bad patch. There are already drugs available to treat alcoholism, but their effects vary widely. As scientists' understanding of what alcohol does to our brain functions deepens, so, potentially, does the range of possible treatments. Data from Thomson Pharma, a ThomsonReuters company that monitors the drug industry, show there are 24 drugs in development for alcoholism, including around 10 or more in mid-stage trials. BIG BOOZERS ATTRACT BIG PHARMA Drug giants Merck and Eli Lilly are the biggest hitters stepping up to the plate at the moment: each is pursuing two possible drugs through mid-stage human trials for treating alcoholism. Biotech firm Alkermes is also very active in this area, with three drugs in development -- two new compounds, and the third a new format of an existing medicine. As is often the case when drugmakers show renewed interest in an expanding concern, critics may accuse the firms of seeking to create a "new disease" to generate a market for otherwise unnecessary medicines. But others argue the outcome could prove a lifeline to millions whose drinking presents a risk to their health, and a big bill to society. "They don't need the intensity of treatment that more severe cases do," said Willenbring. "They don't need to go to alcoholics anonymous for the rest of their lives, they can respond well to some medication and brief behavioral support." Alcohol and its consequences kill 2.3 million people a year around the world, according to the World Health Organization: that amounts to 3.8 percent of all deaths, ranking drink just below unsafe sex and just above malnutrition in the top 10 causes of death. When it comes to the burden of disease caused by alcohol, the evidence against drink really stacks up. As well as contributing to traumatic death and injury in car crashes and other accidents, alcohol is associated with chronic liver disease, many cancers, acute alcohol poisoning, fetal alcohol syndrome and heart disease -- which is itself the No. 1 killer of men and women in industrialized nations. "Here in the U.S. we have at least 18 million adults who suffer from alcohol use disorder, and probably twice that many who are high-risk drinkers who don't have a diagnosis. We also have roughly 7.5 million adolescents who are binge drinkers, and at least a 1.5 million who are alcohol dependent," said Raye Litten, the NIAAA's chief of medications development. "That's quite a market -- and it is intriguing to large pharmaceutical companies." In Britain and other parts of Europe, the need may even be greater. Almost a quarter of Britons -- 33 percent of men and 16 percent of women -- are hazardous drinkers, and binge-drinking and its consequences are daily fare for newspaper headline writers and the politicians who must respond to them. "The toll of alcohol-abuse-fueled aberrant behaviors, from interfamilial violence to slaughter on the highways, wreaks havoc in a scope and intensity that is leagues ahead of all illegal drugs put together," wrote Harry Tracy, a psychologist and publisher of NeuroInvestment, a monthly publication specializing in central nervous system disorders, in a recent report. DRUGS -- THE OLD AND THE NEW The race to find more effective drugs is among the hottest areas in alcoholism research, according to the NIAAA's Litten. Of those available so far, none comes close to being a "magic pill" for drunks, or even high-risk drinkers. Naltrexone, which cuts the desire to drink by blocking the brain's opioid receptors, has been around for years. Disulphiram works on the enzymes that metabolise alcohol to make users feel awful if they drink, while acamprosate is thought to ease withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety and insomnia. The problem is that one drug can work well in some people, yet have virtually no effect on others. Some make people feel so bad they stop taking them and go back to the bottle. Of the potential new drugs tracked by Thomson Pharma, many are in very early experimental stages, and given the slow and uncertain pace of drug development it could be a decade or more before something -- if anything -- comes of them. Those in clinical trials have a 30 percent likelihood of approval rating on BioMedTracker, an analysis tool from Sagient Research, which also works in partnership with Thomson Pharma. That's average for a drug at that stage. Yet addiction experts are encouraged -- not least by progress in what scientists know about alcohol what it does to the brain. "In the alcohol field over the past 10 years, what we've found is that it's not just one neurotransmitter system, it's multiple neurotransmitter systems that are involved in alcohol-seeking and drinking behavior," said Litten. "Because of that, researchers are looking at a variety of sites in the brain and coming up with new types of medications to be tested." Eli Lilly's OpRA II drug targets the brain's opioid receptors, as does Naltrexone, but neither Lilly nor Merck has disclosed the targets for their other experimental drugs. Alkermes's three projects are all aimed at opioid receptors. A couple of firms, AstraZeneca and Transcept Pharma, are looking at compounds that hit dopamine receptors -- the "reward" pathway in the brain. Another possibility showing early promise is topiramate, a medicine which hits multiple sites in the brain and is used in epilepsy and migraine treatment. It has shown some ability to cut alcohol intake in heavy drinkers in a small clinical trial. And other scientists, like Colin Drummond at the National Addiction Center and Britain's Institute of Psychiatry in London, are focusing on the brain's stress pathways. He is about to start a small experiment with mifepristone, which researchers hope may be able to reduce the extreme levels of the stress hormone cortisol released in the brain when alcoholics quit drinking. "We're going to start a trial where we will give it to alcoholic patients who come in for detox, with a view to reducing the brain effects of withdrawal," he told Reuters. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.j-hady.com/a-bottle-of-pills-to-kick-the-bottle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

